Shelved. Regula was a fun thought experiment about radical standardization in EV manufacturing — interesting to write up, never serious as a near-term Apotentia project. The thesis still works on its own terms; we just aren't the company that's going to build it. Kept up as a historical post. See the pause-note for the broader refocus on revenue.
Here's a thought experiment: what would happen if a car company made exactly one vehicle? Not one model with twelve trims. Not one platform with three body styles. One car. One color. One interior. One drivetrain. The only choice is battery range.
That was the premise behind Regula Motor Company, our conceptual EV manufacturer. And the more I dug into the economics, the more convinced I was that radical standardization is the key to making electric vehicles genuinely affordable.
The Hidden Cost of Choice
Modern automakers love to talk about "options." But every option has a cost that goes far beyond the sticker price to the consumer:
- Paint shop complexity: Every additional color requires separate mixing, cleaning, quality control, and waste management. Some factories spend 30-40% of their energy budget on paint alone.
- Trim-specific tooling: Different interiors mean different molds, different suppliers, different quality checks. A "Sport" trim with different seats, steering wheel, and dash inserts is a parallel production line in everything but name.
- Supply chain branching: Each trim level multiplies the number of SKUs. A car with 6 trims and 10 colors has 60 possible configurations before you even count option packages.
- Wiring harness variants: The wiring harness is one of the most complex parts of a car. Every option package means a different harness variant—different sensors, different connectors, different routing.
- Training and QC overhead: Assembly line workers need to know every variant. Quality control needs to verify every combination.
When you add it all up, the cost of "choice" is staggering. And it's passed directly to the consumer.
The Ford Model T Didn't Fail
People love to joke about Henry Ford's "any color as long as it's black" line. But what they miss is that the Model T's radical standardization was the entire point. It made the car affordable for the average American.
Before the Model T, cars were luxury goods. After it, they were transportation. The difference wasn't some breakthrough in engine technology—it was manufacturing discipline. One design. One process. Relentless optimization of that one thing.
The auto industry eventually moved away from that model because consumer preferences diversified and manufacturing technology made variety cheaper. But "cheaper" isn't "free." The variety tax is still there, hidden in every MSRP.
The EV implication
Electric vehicles are simpler than internal combustion vehicles. Fewer moving parts. No transmission variants. No engine displacement options. The platform is already more standardized than ICE.
But EV manufacturers are adding complexity back in with trims, option packages, and configurations. A Tesla Model 3 comes in multiple variants with different motors, different interiors, and different feature sets. A Hyundai Ioniq 6 has five trim levels. BMW's i4 has four.
Every one of those variants adds cost. And that cost is why the average EV still starts well above $30,000.
The Regula Approach
Regula's Civitas was designed to eliminate all of that:
- One exterior color. No paint shop complexity.
- One interior. No trim-specific tooling.
- One drivetrain (AWD). No motor variants.
- Battery range as the only variable. Same car, different battery capacity.
This isn't about limiting choice for the sake of it. It's about asking: what if we redirected all the engineering effort spent on making 12 mediocre configurations into making one configuration excellent?
The Target: Under $25,000
Our internal feasibility analysis suggests that a compact AWD EV sedan built under radical standardization principles could target an MSRP under $25,000. For context, the cheapest AWD EV sedan on the American market right now starts around $34,000.
The gap is significant. And it's not closed by battery breakthroughs or magic materials—it's closed by manufacturing discipline.
Is This Realistic?
Regula is a conceptual project. It lives in the "Moonshots" section of our projects page for a reason. Building a car company requires enormous capital, deep engineering talent, supply chain partnerships, and regulatory certification.
But the underlying thesis—that radical standardization can dramatically reduce per-vehicle costs—isn't theoretical. It's how every other industry achieves scale economics. Cars just haven't applied it aggressively enough.
We're not the company that's going to build Regula. We're building software. The economics still feel sound to me, though, and the thought experiment was worth running.
-ES